Blizzard: Look to the Worgen – make ToL a toggle!
OK, so. Blizz says the Tree of Life (ToL) form is slowly becoming a pointless costume, rather than a useful shapeshift. Cats and bears have entirely new abilities and gameplay while in their forms; trees do not. Shifting into tree restricts us and hides our armor. Whether or not we agree with that, it’s what Blizzard believes.
But a huge number of trees don’t want to lose their tree look to a cooldown. Some people are saying “stop whining, you aren’t losing tree form, it’s just on a cooldown.” Whoosh. That’s the sound of our concern flying over your head. We want to be able to continue to walk around town as a tree if we want. To fight as a tree. To just be a tree. Putting our identifying form on a cooldown is a horrible prospect.
Yes – I’m sure the ability or buff they attach to this cooldown will be great. I’m not saying it’s a nerf to our performance – it will be a gain, I’m sure. That’s not the issue either. We just want to be able to be trees. Whenever we like.
Here’s what I think should happen.
Keep legacy tree form, but put it on an optional toggle.
The current tree of life form (legacy tree) should stay in the game, but be opened up only when you spec deep enough into the resto tree to pick up Blizzard’s new uber tree cooldown (which, I assume, will be at the same spot in the tree anyway).
Speccing this deep “unlocks” the ability to look like legacy tree, if you wish.
Legacy tree is activated through a Two Forms toggle spell, à la Worgen:
Two Forms is a racial ability available to worgen which allows them to freely transform between their human and worgen forms while outside of combat. The transformation is purely cosmetic.
Worgen will already have Two Forms to toggle their humanoid form, so it would have to be a different ability. Let’s bust out the imagination and call it Tree Form.

- If you wish to look like a tree, you hit Tree Form. You will now be a tree for as long as you like, until you hit Tree Form again. Just like a “real” shapeshift – except it is basically just a costume. Like Worgen’s humanoid form – it adds nothing to your character in terms of performance, just flavour/art/RP/etc.
- If you hate legacy tree form and wish to never ever look like it again (because you think it’s hideous, or you want to see your gear while you fight), don’t ever hit Tree Form. This also helps to be less of a target in PvP.
- When the uber tree cooldown is activated and we transform into New Tree, both tree lovers and tree haters alike can go “ooooh” at Blizzard’s new model. Then we can save the day, transform back into whichever form we choose (legacy tree or humanoid/”caster”), and go along our merry way.
See how easy it is to keep the tree “flavour”, but allow the people who hate tree form to never use it if they don’t care to?
Those of us who love our legacy tree can wear that shapeshift “costume” whenever we like. And those who hate it won’t ever have to wear it, ever again.
Plus, Blizzard doesn’t have to balance around a shapeshift that restricts our offensive casting and doesn’t add any unique abilities. They can balance around “caster form”.
And, importantly, nobody has to invest talent points into a talent that is chiefly cosmetic rather than functional, which is one of Blizzard’s main concerns. The costume toggle is simply attached to the new cooldown ability talent – which will likely be a core talent in the resto tree, so you would be picking it up anyway. No wasted talent points, no imbalance, no forcing people to look a certain way if they don’t want to.
Everybody is happy!*
(*This statement is never, ever entirely true, but for the purposes of this scenario, I believe that almost everyone would be happy.)
Possibly Related Posts:
| Print article |
This entry was posted by Keeva on April 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, and is filed under Changes. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. Comment Policy - Comments are welcome! I don't mind at all if you disagree with what I have to say here, provided that a) you are civil about it, and b) you do not try to dictate what I should or shouldn't be writing on my blog. This is my corner of the web, and I reserve the right to edit or delete comments that I deem to be offensive. |



My name is Emma and I live in Australia. I’ve been gaming on and off since I was about 11. I won’t tell you exactly how long ago that was, let’s just say long enough.
about 1 year ago
Wonderful idea! I’m curious though: it seems like your proposed solution will work such that going into “Tree costume form” won’t remove CC… is that the way you mean it?
I think it probably should, to avoid confusion with the old tree form– in that sense, however, it would be more than just cosmetic. GC was never clear on if Blizz has some problem with us being able to move out of CC while still being in caster forms- that’s something I don’t want to lose.
about 1 year ago
Great idea
Depending on the new artwork for ToL, I’ll probably be happy with just toggling in and out of the new tree rather than keeping the old artwork.. but I agree that since the Worgen will get to do it, the mechanics should be already available, right?
Angelya´s last blog ..Progress Post: Bumbling Along
about 1 year ago
Your idea is much better than the alternative Keeva, and I hope Blizzard decides to listen to your (and other trees who are shouting about this proposed change) ideas.
Personally, though, I play a druid so my character can “become” something, not just wear a costume. I mean, there are reasons to switch into bear/cat/moonkin form besides just to look like a bear, cat or moonkin. I would hate if we had a passive tree form in cataclysm that did nothing but make my character look like a tree. They might as well make it a wand you pick up during Hallow’s End.
Beck´s last blog ..Why?
about 1 year ago
I should mention that it’s not originally my idea – I just saw someone say “can’t worgen toggle their human form?” and so I went looking.
about 1 year ago
Or make the cosmetic treeform a minor glyph.
about 1 year ago
Well, the problem with that is that you would have to un-glyph anytime you didn’t want to be a tree. There are times (such as for kill shots etc) that I am in Tauren form.
Unless the glyph is one that *hides* tree form, and could be used by the people who hate tree form and never want to use it. That would probably be the better option.
However – a toggle would suit both sides, and it wouldn’t take a glyph slot!
about 1 year ago
I still think that if you have time to stand around and admire your gear in the middle of a fight you’re probably a horrible player or running way to easy content.
Let druids be shapeshifters!
about 1 year ago
I still think that if you’re only staring at Grid/etc and not noticing anything around you, you’re probably a horrible player and will die in a fire.
Seriously, my druid is RIGHT THERE. Power Auras surround her. They’re there because they’re important. If you can ignore the thing being surrounded and only see the colorful circles around it… good for you, I can’t. (And unless you’re doing progression, fights will give you down time. You can’t just fly up to the LK without doing Marrowgar.)
Jen´s last blog ..Quickie Re: trees
about 1 year ago
I think that’s a great compromise! Sign me up!
Of course, my non-druid guildies aren’t seeing this as a big deal.
I just think it’s funny how Blizzard presented it: “A lot of druids have complained about not seeing their armor, so we’re going to make it so you have no choice in the matter.”
Plus, I have to say, when I’m running through a cramped dungeon, tree form is so much skinnier than my voluptuous tauren form. ^_____^
about 1 year ago
Wonderful compromise! Man, I really hope they listen to great suggestions such as this. Let me keep my tree blizz!
Ali´s last blog ..Drak’Tharon Keep is the Worst Dungeon Ever.
about 1 year ago
I’d much prefer tree form to still do something. But… yeah, this would make me stop whining. With all the costumes, alternate forms, random effects, weapon procs in the game that change your shape, this would be no big deal.
Analogue´s last blog ..Think Like A Healer: Personal Situational Awareness
about 1 year ago
It’s a lovely idea, Keeva! /cross fingers, toes, roots, branches.
Sylly´s last blog ..Arise! … Arise, I said! … wtf???
about 1 year ago
IDK, for my money ToL ought to DO something. If Blizz cannot come up with an interesting benefit for ToL form, that’s kind of a failure of imagination in my mind. As a total last resort I could get on board with this but I think it is probably best that the community set its sights a little higher.
about 1 year ago
As much as I don’t care for the form’s removal, and as much as I agree that Blizzard is pretty full of sh*t on their reasons for doing it, I don’t think they will be changing anything. To do so would be to acknowledge that community bitching can actually accomplish things. Look how long we had to wait to get a new cat and bear form.
about 1 year ago
“We might (*might*) consider a minor glyph that kept the visual of the old tree form in some fashion even when not using the Tree of Life cooldown.” -Ghostcrawler
about 1 year ago
This is a fantastic idea. I love it! I also love the thought of a minor glyph that tkc posted about above. I can totally ditch my aquatic speed glyph (although in cataclysm…. maybe it’ll come in handy) for a OMGTREEFORM glyph.
Averna´s last blog ..Cataclysm: Druid Preview
about 1 year ago
As I said above, the problem with a glyph is that (as far as I can imagine) it would make tree form somehow permanent. I don’t actually want to be a tree 100% of the time – there are times when I want to be Tauren Keeva.
If the glyph created the ability to go into tree (like a toggle), then fine – but that seems like a waste of a glyph slot when they could just give us a toggle by itself, like Worgen.
about 1 year ago
/signs petition
i do hope blizz implements something that allows us the choice of keeping our tree form without having to resort to using a glyph. and this is a great idea!
about 1 year ago
This is an awesome idea – I really hope they implement something like this, it would stop the QQ on both sides in one swift stroke.
about 1 year ago
/Sign
I very well thought out idea, as usual.